156 AI acquisitions across 14 niches, with deal values, revenue estimates, funding raised, EV/Revenue, EV/Funding, buyer details, and source links in one working Excel file.
Each tab answers a different acquisition-pricing question. Use the summary tabs to frame the market, the stage analysis to understand timing, the buyer analysis to map repeat acquirers, and the database to support every number with a source.
Orientation tab explaining what the dataset includes, how the file is organized, how to use the data, and how to interpret AI M&A multiples by niche, layer, and funding stage.
Market-level overview by AI niche, including deal count, average EV/Revenue, median EV/Revenue, minimum and maximum multiples, plus Core AI versus Applied AI comparison.
Funding-stage view from Seed and Series A through Series H, IPO/Public, PE-owned, and bootstrapped targets, with deal count, EV/Revenue, and EV/Funding metrics.
Repeat-acquirer view showing which buyers are most active, how many deals they completed, and how their EV/Revenue and EV/Funding multiples compare across AI acquisitions.
All 156 transactions with target, AI niche, layer, buyer, stage, total funding, enterprise value, revenue, EBITDA, EV/Revenue, EV/EBITDA, EV/Funding, and source links.
Usage terms, methodology limitations, assumptions, and guidance for interpreting disclosed, estimated, and sourced acquisition data.
This is the level of detail inside the workbook, with stage-level acquisition patterns, niche-level valuation differences, buyer behavior, and selected transaction-level fields.
156 acquisitions · Q2 2026 · Funding stages, niches, buyers, and valuation multiples
| Funding stage | Deals | Share of total | Median EV/Revenue | Average EV/Revenue | Median EV/Funding |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed | 19 | 12.3% | 12.5x | 27.9x | 12.9x |
| Series A | 31 | 20.0% | 17.3x | 31.3x | 6.1x |
| Series B | 34 | 21.9% | 15.4x | 27.5x | 4.7x |
| Series C | 17 | 11.0% | 16.6x | 29.8x | 5.8x |
| Series D | 9 | 5.8% | 15.8x | 29.7x | 5.2x |
| IPO/Public | 15 | 9.7% | 9.4x | 9.3x | n/a |
| PE-Owned | 5 | 3.2% | 7.6x | 7.1x | 70.3x |
| AI niche | Deals | Average EV/Revenue | Median EV/Revenue | Min | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infrastructure | 35 | 27.4x | 19.8x | 1.7x | 111.1x |
| Data Intelligence | 29 | 35.1x | 18.6x | 2.0x | 250.0x |
| Cybersecurity | 23 | 24.6x | 15.7x | 2.5x | 116.7x |
| Marketing Tech | 16 | 13.1x | 6.9x | 2.3x | 81.2x |
| Computer Vision | 13 | 12.5x | 8.2x | 2.5x | 40.0x |
| HR Tech | 9 | 21.5x | 14.3x | 3.7x | 64.5x |
| Buyer | Deals | Share of dataset | Average EV/Revenue | Median EV/Revenue | Median EV/Funding |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nvidia | 7 | 4.5% | 35.8x | 40.0x | 5.4x |
| IBM | 6 | 3.8% | 14.4x | 10.5x | 7.1x |
| Microsoft | 6 | 3.8% | 42.7x | 36.2x | 1.3x |
| Salesforce | 6 | 3.8% | 20.7x | 16.5x | 7.5x |
| Databricks | 5 | 3.2% | 80.4x | 44.4x | 7.7x |
| 5 | 3.2% | 29.2x | 18.6x | 6.0x |
* Preview based on the Q2 2026 workbook. The full dataset contains 156 transaction-level rows with buyer, target, niche, layer, funding stage, deal value, revenue, funding, multiples, and source links where available.
This is not a generic AI market report. It is a working file for professionals who need acquisition benchmarks, funding-stage context, and deal-level support for valuation, exit planning, and M&A analysis.
Benchmark potential exit scenarios, understand where AI companies are being acquired by stage, and avoid anchoring M&A expectations to average multiples distorted by outliers.
Compare exit value, capital raised, and funding-stage outcomes across AI acquisitions to support portfolio valuation, exit planning, and investment committee discussions.
Build AI acquisition comp sets faster, separate early-stage strategic-control deals from mature-company transactions, and support buyer or seller valuation arguments with sourced benchmarks.
Understand where strategic buyers are most active, which stages carry premium multiples, and how acquisition pricing changes as AI targets mature.
Representative feedback from buyers of Finro valuation datasets and advisory clients using comparable-company and M&A data in real decision-making work.
"We used the dataset to come up with an internal valuation and it helped us confirm assumptions we had been relying on anecdotally. Having structured comp sets by AI niche made the difference.
"Exactly what I needed to build a defensible comparable set for an AI infrastructure client. The niche segmentation meant I wasn't averaging across companies that aren't genuinely comparable.
"We used the dataset to construct our valuation and support our argument for a revenue multiple in the sale. It gave us a structured, defensible comp set we could put in front of the other side.
"We used the dataset to benchmark a valuation on a company we had invested in, with third parties also reviewing the position. It gave us a credible, structured reference point we could share externally.
No subscription. No gated add-ons. You get the complete workbook the moment you buy.
Secure checkout via Stripe. Redirect to download page after payment. Non-refundable digital product. VAT may apply depending on your location.